ilmsarchashmalari@umail.uz +998 91-915-45-55 220100, Urganch shahri, Hamid Olimjon koʻchasi, 14-uy.
O'zbekcha Русский English
Arxiv / №1 · 2026 / Maqola
13.00.00 – PEDAGOGIKA FANLARI

OLIY TA’LIM TIZIMIDA “CLAUDE AI”DAN FOYDALANISHNING AXLOQIY JIHATLARI: ADOLATLI YONDASHUV, BAHOLASH JARAYONLARI, AKADEMIK HALOLLIKKA TA’SIRI BO‘YICHA TIZIMLI TAHLIL

Annotatsiya
O'ZBEKCHA

Ushbu maqola oliy ta’lim tizimida“Claude AI” kabi generativ sun’iy intellekt texnolo-giyalarining jadal joriy etilishi bilan yuzaga kelayotgan axloqiy masalalarni ilmiy asosda tahlil qiladi. AI vositalari ta’limni individuallashtirish, baholash jarayonlarini avtomatlashtirish va o‘quv samaradorligini oshirish imkonini bersa-da, ular adolat, shaffoflik, ma’lumotlar maxfiyligi va mas’uliyat kabi muhim tamo-yillarga xavf tug‘dirishi mumkin. Tizimli sharh mavjud tadqiqotlar asosida ushbu axloqiy muammolarni aniqlab, sun’iy intellektdan mas’uliyatli va xavfsiz foydalanish uchun amaliy tavsiyalarni taklif etadi.

Kalit so'zlar: Claude AI, generativ sun’iy intellekt, oliy ta’lim, axloqiy masalalar, adolat tamoyili, baholash tizimi, akademik halollik, raqamli pedagogika, AI integratsiyasi
РУССКИЙ

В данной статье проводится научный анализ этических проблем, возникающих в связи с быстрым внедрением генеративных технологий искусственного интеллекта, таких как Claude AI, в систему высшего образования. Несмотря на то, что ИИ способствует персонализации обучения, автоматизации оценивания и повышению эффективности образовательного процесса, его применение затрагивает вопросы справедливости, прозрачности, конфиденциальности данных и институциональной ответственности. На основе существующих исследований обзор выявляет ключевые этические риски и предлагает практические рекомендации по ответственному и без-опасному использованию ИИ

Ключевые слова: Claude AI, генеративный искусственный интеллект, высшее образование, этические вопросы, справедливость, надёжность оценивания, автономия обучающихся, академи-ческая добросовестность, цифровая педагогика.
ENGLISH

This article provides a scientific analysis of the ethical challenges emerging from the rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence tools, such as Claude AI, into higher education. While AI supports personalized learning, automates assessment processes, and enhances educational efficiency, it simultaneously raises concerns regarding fairness, transparency, data privacy, and institutional responsibility. Based on existing research, this systematic review identifies key ethical issues and offers practical recommendations to ensure the responsible and safe implementation of AI technologies.

Keywords: Claude AI, generative artificial intelligence, higher education, ethical issues, fairness, assessment reliability, learner autonomy, academic integrity, digital pedagogy.
Maqola · PDF
PDF yuklab olish Yangi oynada ochish

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

  1. Bobula M. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education: a comprehensive review of challenges, opportunities, and implications [Review of Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education: a comprehensive review of challenges, opportunities, and implications]. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 30. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi30.1137
  2. Yo‘ldashev A. (2024). Sun’iy intellekt tushunchasi va uning falsafiy tahlili. ResearchGate Academic Repo-sitory.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392870141
  3. Abdullayev M. (2023). Sun’iy intellektning jamiyat rivojlanishiga ta’siri: imkoniyatlar va xavflar. O‘z-bekiston Milliy universiteti ilmiy jurnali
  4. Ismail A.F.O., Khairuddin A.Z. (2024). Exploring Ethical Dilemmas of AI Generative Tools Among Higher Education Students: A Systematic Review [Review of Exploring Ethical Dilemmas of AI Generative Tools Among Higher Education Students: A Systematic Review]. Advances in Computer Science Research, 255. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-589-8_24
  5. Đerić E., Frank D., Vuković D. (2025). Exploring the Ethical Implications of Using Generative AI Tools in Higher Education. Informatics, 12(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12020036
  6. Licht K.de F. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Why the “Banning Approach” to Student use is Sometimes Morally Justified. Philosophy & Technology, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00799-9
  7. Dabis A., Csáki C. (2024). AI and ethics: Investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org /10.1057/s41599-024-03526-z
  8. Laflamme A.S., Bruneault F. (2025). Redefining Academic Integrity in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: The Essential Contribution of Artificial Intelligence Ethics. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 56(2), 481. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp-2024–1125
  9. Perkins M., Furze L., Roe J., MacVaugh J. (2023). The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/ arxiv.2312.07086
  10. Slimi Z., Villarejo-Carballido B. (2023). Navigating the Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: An Analysis of Seven Global AI Ethics Policies. TEM Journal, 590. https://doi.org/10.18421/ tem122-02
← Songa qaytish