ilmsarchashmalari@umail.uz +998 91-915-45-55 220100, Urganch shahri, Hamid Olimjon koʻchasi, 14-uy.
Arxiv / №8 · 2026 / Maqola
82.0:801.73:591
10.00.00 – FILOLOGIYA FANLARI

ZOOPOETIKA ADABIYOTSHUNOSLIK PARADIGMASI SIFATIDA VA UNING ZAMONAVIY TALQIN TAMOYILLARI

Annotatsiya
O'ZBEKCHA

. Maqolada zoopoetikaning adabiyotshunoslikdagi maqomi, nazariy manbalari va za-monaviy talqin tamoyillari tahlil qilinadi. Yo‘nalishdagi to‘rt oqim – falsafiy-etik, poetik-formal, narratolo-gik va kognitiv-semiotik yondashuvlar qiyoslanib, har birining tahliliy imkoniyati o‘zbek badiiy nasridan olingan aniq misollar asosida ko‘rsatiladi. Zoopoetik o‘qishning bosh sharti, ya’ni, hayvon obrazini ramz-ga aylantirmaslik talabi va antropomorfizm masalasi muhokama qilinadi.

Kalit so'zlar: zoopoetika, adabiy hayvon tadqiqotlari, paradigma, antropomorfizm, badiiy obraz, ta-naviy tasvir, zoonim, o‘xshatish.
РУССКИЙ

В статье анализируется статус зоопоэтики в литературоведении, её теоре-тические источники и принципы современной интерпретации. Сопоставляются четыре течения направления – философско-этическое, поэтико-формальное, нарратологическое и когнитивно-се-миотическое, аналитические возможности каждого показаны на конкретных примерах из узбекс-кой художественной прозы. Обсуждаются главное требование зоопоэтического чтения – не пре-вращать образ животного в символ – и проблема антропоморфизма.

Ключевые слова: зоопоэтика, литературные исследования животных, парадигма, антропо-морфизм, художественный образ, телесное описание, зооним, сравнение.
ENGLISH

The article analyses the status of zoopoetics in literary studies, its theoretical sources and the principles of its contemporary interpretation. Four currents of the field – the philosophical-ethical, the poetic-formal, the narratological and the cognitive-semiotic – are compared, and the analytical potential of each is demonstrated on concrete examples drawn from Uzbek literary prose. The central requirement of zoopoetic reading, namely the demand not to turn the animal image into a symbol, and the problem of anthropomorphism are discussed.

Keywords: zoopoetics, literary animal studies, paradigm, anthropomorphism, literary image, bodily description, zoonym, simile.

Maqola · PDF

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

  1. Derrida J. The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow). Trans. by D.Wills. Critical Inquiry. Chicago, 2002, vol. 28, № 2, p. 369–418
  2. Moe A.M. Zoopoetics: Animals and the Making of Poetry. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2014, 170 p.
  3. Herman D. Narratology beyond the Human: Storytelling and Animal Life. New York, Oxford University Press, 2018, 384 p.
  4. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980, 242 p
  5. Borgards R. Introduction: Cultural and Literary Animal Studies. Journal of Literary Theory. Berlin, 2015, vol. 9, № 2, p. 155–160.
  6. Jalolov G‘. O‘zbek xalq ertaklari poetikasi. Monografiya, Toshkent, “Fan”, 1976, 158-bet.
  7. Xoshimova O.O. O‘zbek va ingliz tillarida zoonimik frazeologik birliklarning leksik-semantik va leksiko-grafik tadqiqi. Filol. fan. bo‘yicha falsafa doktori (PhD) dis. avtoreferati, Namangan, 2025, 58-bet.
  8. Driscoll K., Hoffman E. Introduction: What Is Zoopoetics? What Is Zoopoetics? Texts, Bodies, Entan-glement. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, p. 1–13.
  9. Driscoll K., Hoffman E. Introduction: What Is Zoopoetics? What Is Zoopoetics? Texts, Bodies, Entan-glement. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, p. 1–13.
← Songa qaytish