“ELEKTR ENERGIYASINI ISHLAB CHIQARISH, UZATISH VA TAQSIMLASH” FANINI O‘QITISHGA MOS INTERFAOL METODLAR ISHLAB CHIQISH
Maqolada “Elektr energiyasini ishlab chiqarish, uzatish va taqsimlash” fanini o‘qi-tishda interfaol metodlardan foydalanish imkoniyatlari yoritilgan. Texnik fanlarning o‘ziga xos xususiyat-laridan kelib chiqib, talabalarning texnik fikrlashi va amaliy faolligini rivojlantirishga qaratilgan “Energi-ya sarguzashti” interfaol metodi taklif etilgan. Metod orqali issiqlik elektr stansiyasining asosiy qurilmala-ri va energiya aylanish jarayoni muammoli vaziyatlar asosida o‘zlashtiriladi. Metodning bosqichlari va ta’lim jarayonida qo‘llash imkoniyatlari ko‘rsatib berilgan.
В статье рассмотрены возможности использования интерактивных методов при преподавании дисциплины «Производство, передача и распределение электрической энергии». С учетом особенностей технических дисциплин предложен интерактивный метод «Энергетичес-кое приключение», направленный на развитие технического мышления и практической активности студентов. Посредством метода изучаются основные элементы тепловой электростанции и про-цессы преобразования энергии на основе проблемных ситуаций. Раскрыты этапы метода и воз-можности его применения в образовательном процессе.
The article examines the possibilities of using interactive methods in teaching the discipline “Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electrical Energy”. Taking into account the specific characteristics of technical disciplines, the interactive method “Energy Adventure” is proposed to develop students’ technical thinking and practical engagement. The method enables students to study the main components of a thermal power plant and energy conversion processes through problem-based situations. The stages of the method and its application in the educational process are presented.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar
- Prince M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research // Journal of Engineering Education.– 2004, vol. 93, № 3, p. 223–231. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
- Prince M.J., Felder R.M. Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education. 2006, vol. 95, № 2, p. 123–138. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006. tb00884.x.
- Freeman S., Eddy S.L., mcdonough M., Smith M.K., Okoroafor N., Jordt H., Wenderoth M.P. Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014, vol. 111, № 23, p. 8410–8415. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
- Springer L., Stanne M.E., Donovan S.S. Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. 1999, vol. 69, №. 1, p. 21–51. DOI: 10.3102/00346543069001021.
- Hake R.R. Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses // American Journal of Physics. 1998, vol. 66, № 1, p. 64–74. DOI: 10.1119/1.18809.
- ). Streveler R.A., Menekse M. Taking a Closer Look at Active Learning. Journal of Engineering Education. 2017, vol. 106, № 3, p. 413–415. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20160.
- ). Edström K., Kolmos A. PBL and CDIO: Complementary Models for Engineering Education Development. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2014, vol. 39, № 1, p. 7–24. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2013.833170.
- Li Y., Schoenfeld A.H., diSessa A.A., Graesser A.C., Benson L C., English L.D., Duschl R.A. On Thinking and STEM Education // Educational Researcher. 2019, vol. 48, №. 6, p. 368–373.